Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:35:36 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1536582938; bh=/lek/r0vX492jOdRHTD5SP3yNZCl/WIgalgCeAJY4EQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=rq/Gre4fUVXKZlFIdMjZNsLyC3VwQ+GsGFNGDr4Iv/Ea56eMr3DMTWvwGFUqm6ySn 6zb2gTcS8sHB/BP5w127UyqbwZCPT2j5fX3hCA/maHHE6RSEdaImFzrEhcHTK4u1ZF y9o83ICdQ2COQY7yuXTYN0QzeXkPqzJKdeFS4sVgJaXwodLEPDcjiEDY3qRH6SppZw cNzgTdAptQvQZP3Hb3d2MERCBAVzEtQkTesHdjatcr7BNV8zP+UUJ71FuLb/nvlQ9H T0DfD20AOkGjicFi6HHGohXCGwZQyugujkidbYwbWct/GBBhQc5tbWsXPE4rXQjate h6LCist9X3yKg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi LF,

The experiment is finished. Batteries are back charging.
These are the best reports:

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2018-09-09 03:30   DK7FC   0.137425   -27   0   JN39   1   SM3LNM   JP82qg   1559   20 
 2018-09-09 10:30   DK7FC   0.137425   -24 
 0   JN39   1   2E0ILY   IO82qv   767   303 
 2018-09-09 04:10   DK7FC   0.137425   -25   0   JN39   1   G3XDV   IO91vt   568   300 
 2018-09-08 12:20   DK7FC   0.137424   -16 
 0   JN39   1   DL4RAJ
 JN68kj   449   103 
 2018-09-09 10:20   DK7FC   0.137425   -7   0   JN39   1   DL0AO   JN59vk   349   89 
 2018-09-09 01:20   DK7FC   0.137426   -24   0   JN39   1   PA0RDT   JO11tm   327   315 
 2018-09-09 16:30 
 DK7FC   0.137425   -21 
 0   JN39   1   PI4THT   JO32kf   306   359 
 2018-09-09 07:30 
 DK7FC   0.137425   -6 
 0   JN39   1   DF6NM   JN59nj   301   90 
 2018-09-09 01:40 
 DK7FC   0.137429   -14 
 0   JN39   1   DC0DX/RF   JO31lk   218   0 
 2018-09-08 21:50   DK7FC   0.137424   -28
 0   JN39   1   DC5AL-R   JO31lk   218   0 
 2018-09-09 00:50   DK7FC   0.137425   -27   0   JN39   1   DF2JP   JO31hh   205   354 
 2018-09-09 07:50 
 DK7FC   0.137425   +1 
 0   JN39   1   DK7FC/HD   JN49ik   127   91 
 2018-09-09 09:50 
 DK7FC   0.137425   0 
 0   JN39   1   DL1GCD/1   JN48ar   115   136 

It was interesting to see the special characteristic for such an unconventional antenna. Another interesting thing was to learn about the different feed point impedances. I had no idea before...

Markus calculated 0.4 % efficiency for daytime in low distances, which is not bad at all. The actual distance to Markus is 230 km and with just 10 W it is possible to have a normal CW QSO!
But the night characteristics are not really favourable :-)

It would have been interesting to have someone receiving with a loop antenna, which could pick up the high angle radiation much better than an E field antenna, eventually.
There is so much to play with. It never ends :-)

73, Stefan


Am 10.09.2018 07:06, schrieb [email protected]:

Hello Markus and Stefan,

 

Markus mentioned:

“high angle radiation …possibly leading to deeper fading at intermediate ranges”

 

I would guess the same.

 

I checked the following to see if the 900m/137kHz configuration (> 1/4 wavelength freespace, >> 1/4 wavelength in earth), or some particular earth conductivity, or very-close-proximity to ground, or perhaps some hemispherical spreading in earth ground currents might reliably mitigate high-radiation-angle fading at intermediate ranges.

a) https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2005RS003298

b) https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/64D/jresv64Dn1p27_A1b.pdf

c) “Characteristics of a Power Line Used as a VLF Antenna” (Dazey, Radio Science 1982)

 

Items (a, b and c) augmented a perspective that experiments are more reliable than theory in this realm.

I couldn’t find any basis in theory for ruling out high-radiation-angle fading at intermediate ranges, even with 900m/137kHz, and earth-loop and dipole-on-earth configurations, especially given some possibility of Eh+Ev nulls.

 

Perhaps more valuable than much of the theory is that the transmitter provided good far-field signals on first attempts at 1570 Hz, 1970 Hz, 2470 Hz, 2970 Hz and 137 kHz. That’s really something to think about.

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW      

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Markus Vester
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 5:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend

 

Hi Stefan,

indeed your signal has been very consistent around 5 uV/m and -8 to -10 dB in the afternoon. At 230 km range, this would indicate a radiated power around 40 mW (EMRP), or 0.4% antenna efficiency. Around nightfall, heavy QSB set in, with occaional minima where the signal fell below the decode threshold but was still ghastly visible in the waterfall with heavy RDF colour aberrations. I suspect that the diplole emits more high angle radiation than a vertical, possibly leading to deeper fading at intermediate ranges. 

Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Sa, 8. Sept 2018 22:45
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend

Thanks to the many stations beeing RX-active on LF WSPR tonite.

It is very strange, the SNR reported by the stations below 500 km
distance was very good in daytime but now at night there are not more
stations receiving me, except 2 reports by 2E0ILY.
Also the software just reports JN39 instead of JN39WI.
Maybe some reports are not uploaded or shown on the database, because of
conflicting locators for the same callsign?
I can hardly imagine that nothing comes through at night. Very odd.
Does someone have an explanation what can cause these good results
during the day and such bad results at night?

73, Stefan

PS: My QRG is 137.425 kHz and starts each xx:x0 (each 10 minutes). Maybe
someone can see somethning on the waterfall display?
...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>