Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: A new band is opened up! 191 km | DL0AO results

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ULF: A new band is opened up! 191 km | DL0AO results
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 11:31:09 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1525339871; bh=SMzcKL321Zi8VOS6ZFMR/56+z8o8wKr4zPsBg4Y7160=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Q3HCA0IFNL6RUqezyN8nhPBfR46IgXW9/VXZuq8JywcSZMyPCt4zxxG7+SCH0JlUv 1qe0/REzOhh2lhT/jp18cSEoe69Nrzy3xCGJ4ZG7wEBtSRng68SI+whd4cy6QvugQt SP/R6EeCzbftlKw5lVo/CVENy+gDgApLTLoj9ZrBjm0STwr4T2aMxyRjFKmAadkjUS QXp3Hrs/yTGCHexSgfiK52clAZYcz/Hk5vTmTVc7yLwHLugNOPWh35czfjSi6enDrN gyeQF5o6XrXWZ8a6poSZDsA1AIK7SfyPSYCHSiy8qUg7jtTbulXBcYn9eVnr7oMH/u TUJ5BhMY7UaKQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAL-VeeOzV2P6FQeiauSS=zC-1wt40kD8CbMswNyywtp+9-v99Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Paul, ULF,

There is an interesting unexpected observation: In the night of the 30th, there were strong thunderstorms all over Germany. The noise was very high of course. But when analysing the carrier for that single day (from the DL0AO data file), i'm getting a peak SNR of 10.98 dB for a 10 hour carrier starting 01:20 UTC. A 6 hour carrier starting at the same time produces a similar SNR. That peak is the strongest in 5000 bins. SNR plot attached. I easily decoded a '*' message with good Eb/N0 and no false decodes.

I had serious doubts but then Markus got similar results with his totally different way of data analysis.

Can this be real? Could it be propagation? Could it be that the lightnings have an effect on the ionosphere to improve reflection significantly so that this S/N can be reached? You know that 191 km wave is at about lambda/2 at the height of the ionosphere relative to ground (at night).

We need more such data. The carrier is now running for more than 1 week without an interruption and it will continue further... Oh and we need more thunderstorms on the path! :-)

It would be most interesting to see if you're getting similar results from the data of DL4YHF, which is a different and longer path.

Another thought: I choose 1.57 kHz because this is below that 'cut-off' frequency for distant sferic propagation (the distant sferic S/N drops by say 20 dB at 1.6 kHz at night), so the night QRN is much lower there. BUT, maybe it would be even better to transmit directly on that cut-off frequency, i.e. between 1.6...1.65 kHz?! No problem to move to that frequency but let's collect more data on 1570.01 Hz for the next weeks.
Looks like an ideal summer experiment!

73, Stefan


Am 01.05.2018 15:29, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

So far, nothing at Todmorden, by stacking all the daytime
signals, or by chaining them for super narrow bandwidth.

Some problems using Bielefeld vlf6, the stream often
steps backwards one sample at a time and I'm not sure
where that leaves the phase.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

Attachment: 30.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>