To: | LineOne <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!! |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:14:22 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BZkZUtZFC58BC4i+J/0bI88iB1DnSI5RnAuycEurgJs=; b=TVrq/LUtsnQ4vIsQZS4nkFLEd9hwnoWEVSrD0xC2VIohGymig8yANOn5mpSZbw2mRB Z0chQfdUiSuROoD955NMZzCsnzbUyTbrCErsW87K9x0dl7TeVxA+5bPIU/hkjGZkdaeZ fhdH7hn3VdeULODDea2nmo5DpKkv2sX/yWTKKzbeJ+2Vn/QmfWR8cPqEy2igefgEIYKm /MsRfoWOoL0eK6TRe5mLgbfbGezh5r5zhoTt7QZpC5u49V72+0xAHDP4YxfIqawc2Urq akEW6KRBOoGyy0Ka16AyHYi6y+xFKz6nl93XfNYvMnJj07sEoqjrUf7EFjIpCvgEUHyi eN+g== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <3E3B283424E94B879955DC6E3D55B533@Rob64PC> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
After reading this, I installed WSPR-X on my new Win-10 notebook. It didn't work in "normal" mode. But when modified to run in XP compatibilty mode, worked fine. I ran it in parallel with WSJT-X for a bit last night on 7MHz, and, as was stated here a while back, it wasn't quite as good. Taking longer to decode than WSJT-X did, and also missing a couple of stations that WSJT-X managed to get. And they weren't necessarily the weak ones. Andy G4JNT On 20 February 2018 at 09:47, Mike Dennison <[email protected]> wrote: I will be monitoring. In fact I have been running WSPR-X (the |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, Mike Dennison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | AW: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, Joe Proemper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, Mike Dennison |
Next by Thread: | AW: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, Joe Proemper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |