Hello Paul,
"I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only
seen it used for beaconing."
See
http://www.472khz.org/pages/technical-topics/weak-signal-modes/extreme-narrow-bandwidth-modes.php
(scroll down to "operating practice").
Maybe we should organize a transatlantic QSO party? JT9 and QRSS maybe the best
modes for most of us, the "big guns" can try FT8 or plain CW.
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]>
namens N1BUG <[email protected]>
Verzonden: zondag 4 februari 2018 11:47
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: MF/630M
Just think how many trans-Atlantic QSOs could be made. Some, like
myself are very interested but the primary problem is no one awake
on the east side of the pond at the right times!
I have seen signals strong enough for normal CW only a few times.
JT9 would be easy and requires only about 3 dB more signal to decode
than WSPR2. I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures
for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing.
I've been off MF for a while as I put up a temporary HF antenna to
work the Bouvet DXpedition and it severely messed up tuning of the
MF antenna. Now that the Bouvet trip has been aborted I will be
taking that antenna down and returning to MF as soon as I get a
reasonable weather window. I will likely be on MF for a week or so
before moving to LF.
73,
Paul N1BUG
On 02/04/2018 05:05 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
> Last nite results good but not unusual, had reports from
>
> AA1A, KA1R, VE1YY
>
> Transatlantic contacts seem a regular occurrence at present on MF
> between the UK and N.America
>
> Most operators are using WSPR but more CW both normal and QRSS would
> be welcome like it used to be some years ago, ie real QSO mode
>
> 73 de mal/g3kev/io94sh
|
