To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 8 May 2017 17:05:38 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1494277539; bh=DXei3PHwIp6+6K7NbxjQcMsEejeArW++UG/gawc+oHw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q8s76VkQ2QkkvyNBnzzK1raiUbDKYUgSh5dGFEwX1Mfy5Z8iSUCMem16g50Ywnt0k U1b/4bTqy+XlAOWfKBSB+0zFiOXqo8lmozYlmzhfWXp1CWhtd5O/92rg6V4XrxB8a7 nN/rYBfR2M6fE9XtOz8h4oqU9CYkhXKWrPWsEIic= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Fantastic! Joe's first long transmission is immediately being picked up over the ocean - what a start, at 10 uW! Big congratulations to Paul and Joe, and also to Mike for confirmation from his antenna. All the best, Markus (DF6NM) -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo, 8. Mai 2017 22:01 Betreff: Re: LF: NA VLF Watson-Watt calculation from the antenna amplitudes and phases of the overnight signal gives 244 degrees which is reasonable given the background noise from the south west (pulling the apparent bearing southwards from the great circle 280 deg). Without any calculation, I can see from the relative antenna phases that the signal is from the west: the E/W H-field is very obviously inverted (relative to the E-field) from its familiar polarity on European signals. Joe wrote: > The carrier was generated with an undisciplined 10 MHz DOCXO > clocking an ad9851. As Markus points out, the maths puts it > high by 92.5 uHz. Overnight signal peaks at 8270.0070625 Hz +/- 0.5 uHz. Therefore about 3.6 ppb low of the DDS nominal frequency of 8270.0070925... If I align the FT bins with that frequency, the overnight signal becomes a sharp line - http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170508e.gif with a respectable S/N of 13.9 dB in 46.296 uHz. I'm now confident that this little peak in the spectrum is 10uW from VO1NA. Distance is 3545 km. The signal amounts to about 2.6 electrons on the E-field probe. How's that for a signal report Joe? Also getting a bit of a signal visible at Forest, Virginia. Not a very significant peak but it has the same offset. Only visible on the overnight signal, nothing yet on the daytime. Distance to Forest is 2442 km so that's very good for a land path. http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170508d.gif Forest is E-field only so no rejection of the South American nighttime sferics. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: NA VLF, hvanesce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |