To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: NA VLF |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Mon, 8 May 2017 18:01:50 -0230 (NDT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks Jim, Good to learn that I put the decimal point in the right place for the ERP! 73 Joe On Mon, 8 May 2017, [email protected] wrote: The quantitative agreement is amazing and impressive The water path and favorable Dst don’t hurt estimation, but the long remainder of the error budget chain appears to be impressively controlled. Really amazing. Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 7:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: NA VLF > First TA calibration of a TX antenna current meter with LWPC Daytime signal is measuring 0.04 fT 08:00 to 11:00 which also agrees with LWPC. If this is VO1NA, we should get a good result if Joe is able to keep the transmitter going and phase-stable until 20:00 UT. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: today on the 46km band..., Jacek Lipkowski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: NA VLF, hvanesce |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |