Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz...
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:14 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vU1KQ6AwlKIzHwTWVnGCIKGZ21NMeoH46PnF3+X/bCk=; b=qKNEKMvL/X0jta0rE6nxWH3M25MfkTwWe7PGkHeDJMp6xK0IdxYfoykMeSpcZy9uWJ 2Efe6Kc84oRSnCjMle8/mEy0OxOA7tNP4u8RU0rP572shvg7BMfX0bwGQCbsB12Y9Kyh yc56e2Yha02H1iTXm0xumh1cGjjl4fLx40pdkNVdkMUhAqzLgNC+jM+eSXMcFUFgbFjj Cl3+ZPr/9U4WfO43Vbieu7btInETXOaQNHza2gB7tce5ax2Jhihw/c7scjP6O60wvn7y uuBqdVvbO0lFxjaXaf7ik9xGiE6PbirbJp1TdDvQNBmtC33T1mMfAaBxjqZCumG8IoCV ORKQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Paul,

Interesting. Do you also use the noise normalisation function which proved to be useful in recent stackings on 5170 Hz?

Still a few weeks before the 6 channel input soundcard for the Raspi appears...

73, Stefan

Am 22.03.2017 11:25, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

Stefan wrote:

> Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something
> elso than my signal??

Well I don't know.  It would be an extraordinary achievement
for your 2970 signal to reach this far.  It needs a result
that can stand up to scrutiny.   I'd like to do some more
work with it to get an unequivocal detection at 5 sigma.

> I'm going to run the carrier another few days, at least
> until friday,

A few more days signal will help.   Adding 21st didn't
improve the peak, nor did the blanker settings I left
running last night.

For these runs I am blanking each antenna channel
independently, then mixing and phasing.  Usually I do
the mixing first and blank the composite signal.
While one channel is blanked and another isn't, the
mix is wrong.  That ought to be worse than blanking
after the mix.  With less than 5% blanking factor it
might not be much of an issue either way.

I can also look again at your previous 2970 tests,
stacking the same 14:00 to 19:00 window.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>