Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz...
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:35 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vTXdG1OX7Y2JVi/8Il/yTC7fGNxfseuR/NzQhDraBtQ=; b=q3j8sSTdk23TFiZivShIzlpsRI 26kXWnZulPUTlcKvZ3adaRVqJIhGjj+lGlWeXA3F8pimh27+PMDe+8LISf3Xg7CK6whjz/1hwEhVK 4w+UpECCe83psQya63dMJPgkIs/Ph2cMn7wxSWe6c3pF9Bv52SOQiSvoTvkfrZGTrjrk=;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
Stefan wrote:

> Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something
> elso than my signal??

Well I don't know.  It would be an extraordinary achievement
for your 2970 signal to reach this far.  It needs a result
that can stand up to scrutiny.   I'd like to do some more
work with it to get an unequivocal detection at 5 sigma.

> I'm going to run the carrier another few days, at least
> until friday,

A few more days signal will help.   Adding 21st didn't
improve the peak, nor did the blanker settings I left
running last night.

For these runs I am blanking each antenna channel
independently, then mixing and phasing.  Usually I do
the mixing first and blank the composite signal.
While one channel is blanked and another isn't, the
mix is wrong.  That ought to be worse than blanking
after the mix.  With less than 5% blanking factor it
might not be much of an issue either way.

I can also look again at your previous 2970 tests,
stacking the same 14:00 to 19:00 window.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>