To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:35 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vTXdG1OX7Y2JVi/8Il/yTC7fGNxfseuR/NzQhDraBtQ=; b=q3j8sSTdk23TFiZivShIzlpsRI 26kXWnZulPUTlcKvZ3adaRVqJIhGjj+lGlWeXA3F8pimh27+PMDe+8LISf3Xg7CK6whjz/1hwEhVK 4w+UpECCe83psQya63dMJPgkIs/Ph2cMn7wxSWe6c3pF9Bv52SOQiSvoTvkfrZGTrjrk=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Stefan wrote: > Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something > elso than my signal?? Well I don't know. It would be an extraordinary achievement for your 2970 signal to reach this far. It needs a result that can stand up to scrutiny. I'd like to do some more work with it to get an unequivocal detection at 5 sigma. > I'm going to run the carrier another few days, at least > until friday, A few more days signal will help. Adding 21st didn't improve the peak, nor did the blanker settings I left running last night. For these runs I am blanking each antenna channel independently, then mixing and phasing. Usually I do the mixing first and blank the composite signal. While one channel is blanked and another isn't, the mix is wrong. That ought to be worse than blanking after the mix. With less than 5% blanking factor it might not be much of an issue either way. I can also look again at your previous 2970 tests, stacking the same 14:00 to 19:00 window. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF, VIGILANT Luis Fernández |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz..., DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz..., DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |