To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:52:17 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sUKOzy+SdvJrpxoGE8ISxqsmWlQTqVSC4xXcqhgLCLA=; b=ARZbH2c1JxDfxnrIMahzInskjC Kvq6GDOWkV8xeoK2B8MywwwbmtXlNBVO8TsVTWnfOmFxV38p68ekhMr3esok3+cvCYa8AFQGsgKUo Nq0UYVXc2n+g+5U5MrA0GM6AQqeUIBPfjeZglUndnO3IOfAlTYOCPDCrjOHAtTPPo4qQ=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Stefan wrote: > Maybe it is worth to check if you can extract a peak > from your E field antenna only? I've tried E-field only, and H-field only in various combinations of linear and circular polarisation. The sferic blanker is working quite well I think. Still no trace of the signal here. But tweaking the blanker isn't going to go from 'no trace' to 'significant detection'. > What do YOU need to get a first trace of my signal in the UK? Perhaps I need to move 1/2 wavelength nearer or further? Maybe the sky wave and ground wave are just nicely cancelling out? > Would you do the decode work for me if i try to leave my > call over 3 wavelengths on ULF? Sure. Your chosen settings look OK so long as the signal at Bielefeld is as good as the 21st. It doesn't seem very repeatable, Friday 20th signal was not so good - 6dB weaker and with a large phase difference too. 162 degrees on 20th and 63 degrees on 21st. But on 20th there were three occasions when the Bielefeld timestamp stepped backwards by one sample, which adds up to the extra 100 degrees. Probably accounts for the 6dB loss too. So give the 5 chars a try. If there are not too many timing glitches I can probably adjust for them. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: ULF: 140 km crossed on the 101 km band, first results, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |