Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Smart noise cancelling?!?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Smart noise cancelling?!?
From: Peter <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 18:55:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0
Hi Stefan et al.,

On 03.11.2016 14:22, DK7FC wrote:
...
Last night i thought a bit about noise cancelling on LF/VLF.
 > ...

Running an experimental receiver at VLF/LF for SID-detection (on RPi 3) I chose an almost non-parametric procedure running in frequency domain. It works as follows: Do a windowed FFT, compute the median (by sorting) from the power spectrum. Store all spectra and corresponding median values. Next choose a time period (let's say 100ms), pick the spectrum with the lowest median, plot it, drop all the others. The key is that "Median values" are more robust to outliers compared to other averaging procedures.

See what happened when switching from simple averaging to median selection algorithm (~16:50 utc):
http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/test/show_wf.cgi?date=16-10-02

I know that this won't work in case of searching for coherent signal detection, or would be hard to implement. But using this method I'm detecting such very weak signals from far east like NDI or RTZ on a regular basis.

Drawbacks? Yes; it's throwing away a lot of information which may be useful. Another pitfall has to be mentioned: using 1 sec. as a selection window strong time service transmitters nearly vanished since the algorithm will unerringly choose the gaps [^_^]. Therefore I'm using only the spectral part between 15 and 50 kHz for computing the median values.

Peter, df3lp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>