To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM |
From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:33:05 +0200 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gQmVGy85jGl2vc1m9s8XD3t5CjYXnqqvUl/0hnekLoA=; b=h7hfOlMH3ihaTokp8cjTHy4MopOnCgdqM0RfbB4bHbxl4DKoyiTh3mxdZ4JfZ7gSqO o07ZULXiqAckO1hcNuQTZKbdL0pEX0W4ROtK3PpEA4VCoTBRv9CPH8LikFFc7d8HyGU/ /UW5bGoY/pCfpFtX9aZ03JBYZ2JZluhTjiBlYPZabWwEVoMoJ+iC/q9jNXPopMxDJUQT BynAVQZ/YKB2PpBlV9Rmfg66wU8ttnbYvwbLTWvIUg6jNQZJAFLZ8eoYnCIEsqmD52Sr fa0A9ACqFwesh1t7H+bZkXA5XPQsElajyUUMRatHPQOaWltK1fByCSsnmDNlqAYTPRnu FrXQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23T6h+qeZWipCRCOLC+Q5jCiEGD+XhSF3c5jZS9A6oHQ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Johan, Many thanks for the reference. I now understand much better how these things are arranged. 73 John F5VLF > On 29 Mar 2016, at 09:11, Johan Bodin <[email protected]> wrote: > > That problem can be solved by using a return line and booster transformers > that minimises current leakage into surrounding earth: > > https://library.e.abb.com/public/f1200714de5086c585257d7300287357/1LFI2026%20special%20power%20transformers%20for%20railway%20-%20brochure%20EN.pdf > > 73 de > Johan SM6LKM > > Den 2016-03-17 kl. 15:18, skrev Andy Talbot: >> Is that to minimise skin loss in steel track ? >> >> UK Third rail is, of course, DC, and I once spent an idle moment calculating >> the loss if 50Hz AC were to be used with magnetic iron conductors. I think >> I came to the conclusion a 1MW train could probably travel a few hundred >> metres before it lost its power supply. >> >> andy G4JNT >> >> On 17 March 2016 at 13:21, Johan Bodin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Railway QRG is 16 2/3 Hz in Sweden too. >> >> 73 de Johan SM6LKM >> >> John Rabson wrote: >> I seem to recall that some railway systems use at about 16 2/3 Hz (one third >> of 50 Hz) for traction. >> ... >> Can someone say whether my recollections are correct, please? >> >> 73 John F5VLF >> >> > [email protected] Researching history of RABSON, BLACKSHAW, GAUNTLETT, VERLANDER and ROBSONNE |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: CW beacon 477.7 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [rsgb_lf_group] RE: Cheap and nasty sources - was LF: DK7FC WSPR bad quality problem, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM, David Hine |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 8270Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |