To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:18:27 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hm7nV/g86KezHShtpc2mAGag5ltRed7RG8zbE+tqFQc=; b=KWQh65WOd2p/iV91US12VjUnZmM8A6lV70qN9+n5c8l5yYPI8zuEpGvCLd4kXOJVj2 pZW+0NU5Q6JTyTbcFoyuYS0kbVFUih4zAcFIiNhdn3lB35aE2EaeQqZuEaEUqg+PlGZN LRpQdpADrKKwKQSMFMiaQOQ3QrQl/9ZGFYdi1x9NMU4nvV5tvbyHzbo/1h6NFlVL+uNh mqVQ26+DEa9wt+p8kPijRBl1sQFiX0lxEX9A5f/rCcOgayw/bwrwmHitGV5cTwr/+uro frNNTLR7s4zEEWspVNIMFQ7vDjwiPZa4L4hRLQ3PIhwpSbY7b/VW0jKyZ9NxcPBNuVxt n1+g== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Is that to minimise skin loss in steel track ? UK Third rail is, of course, DC, and I once spent an idle moment calculating the loss if 50Hz AC were to be used with magnetic iron conductors. I think I came to the conclusion a 1MW train could probably travel a few hundred metres before it lost its power supply. andy G4JNT On 17 March 2016 at 13:21, Johan Bodin <[email protected]> wrote: Railway QRG is 16 2/3 Hz in Sweden too. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM, Johan Bodin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM, David Hine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM, Johan Bodin |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM, David Hine |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |