Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: MF: WSPR-15 this night

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: MF: WSPR-15 this night
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:55:15 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1454496915; bh=tX0kGNzflMLtmu/F/xUe66/9ehfLbfHMnvKuIiVJix8=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Eu4iVMYJGsonPRkU9QLVzzXke5Azqf5KS/CcE0JSRAgtjj9ZhmHlyuIyORpv6HB6G 4hSHXorfhIEbW/BZsPR1XzredQTnSOwikNR9DMdxLwVC5FjJLz4Co+sDMKHMvsQ3PC HM6Dp9+t4rp6BaQ1Sgpe0PJxB0xylorCSQKgnX2o=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Tobias,
 
thanks for the picture! The weak signal 5 Hz below DL6II might actually have been mine. I had sent only two WSPR-15 sequences on 475805 Hz (5 Hz below DL6II), starting 22:00 and 22:15. I was using the comparator output from the AD9850 (~ 20 mW), barefoot to the coil and antenna at half height (0.5% efficiency), thus about 0.2 mW ERP. On the other hand, DJ6LB (who is located about 20 km from me) was on 475812 Hz throughout the night, about 2 to 4 Hz above DL6II.
 
Though in this case the weak transmissions were not decoded, I think that WSPR(-15) in general seems to cope rather well with severe QSB (maybe better than QRSS). However a "bent" signal with variable drift (like that from Vinny's transverter) may actually be less likely to decode than one with the first part missing. The situation may be analogous to a phase inversion near the middle of a PSK sequence, resulting in half of the symbols being systematically wrong (50% error rate). On the other hand, replacing half of the sequence by random noise produces only 25% errors.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Mi, 3 Feb 2016 8:52 am
Betreff: Re: Re: LF: MF: WSPR-15 this night
 
Hi Vinny, MF ! 
Good job ! Your signal was ok and loud last night. Congrats ! 

There could have been an additional WSPR-15 station on 475.807 at 22:00h  
to 22:30h, but it was too weak to be decoded at my side.(see picture) No
one else was listed for a decode, so who was it ?

Anyone on this reflector ?

73 de dg3lv Tobias
...

 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>