To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:27:34 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1447968455; bh=Gzog9nYWxGApLSPlf+54LmTfhgUc462hctHQg54omAc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2S83j4KXJ9H6MK7cicqfulq0lpDIQTR+R8ZqxXpk8CGsqvuiSCXJ/ZE1/3YJkMCnl xS3UTEt9Z+92C3hJF81Nyjbgr5CK0PsQizaerLZ+zEKaiXGirEr+vtdpUAWaEiss7C c2Rpy5mRKJ8g8+8yTltGcAQCz2SK5kKZhlwZjvwI= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
> You'll notice that with weak signals, say less than about Eb/N0 = +3dB, it becomes difficult to estimate the reference phase by squaring the signal (or equivalently, costas looping).
Yes, same here when using the show_rawsyms3a utility. The peak in the skyblue spectrum-of-squares will conveniently guide you to the correct frequency and time offset if Eb/N0 is above 4 dB or so. This is for rate 1/8, with more code spread (e.g. r 1/16) the "squaring loss" will be a bit worse.
Here are the Eb/N0 results of successful decodes this afternoon:
UT dB
1500 3.1 1600 11.8 1700 9.0 1730 8.1 1800 4.4 1830 6.4 *** 1900 2.7 1930 7.9 2000 4.0 2030 1.5 2100 6.3 Best 73,
Markus
Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Do, 19 Nov 2015 9:31 pm Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Argo grabber uploads question, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz, IZ7SLZ |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut 137.777000 kHz tonight, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | LF: Variometer positioning, Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |