To: | Graham <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re[4]: LF: Re: Antenna relays |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:23:40 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <9A61F2B2E34C4D3DADDBC99E102D23E1@AGB> |
Organization: | Gatesgarth Developments |
References: | <[email protected]> <1C735FA296594DF897C48882843B0EB7@gnat> <CAA8k23QJA9cywxQHScDv8egMpCLqope-MgEv7Um3D5SG4tGS=w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A44476711@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <9A61F2B2E34C4D3DADDBC99E102D23E1@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Graham, Thursday, November 19, 2015 > Simpler to string something up for HF , away from the loop Chris ? > 73-G, Probably, but my loop works very well on HF, would be sad to lose it to just LF usage. If I had to run dual antennas I would probably keep the loop as HF and add a much higher LF one. But don't tell `er indoors, for Gawd's sake... -- Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Argo grabber uploads question, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Re[2]: LF: Re: Antenna relays, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Re: Antenna relays, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[4]: LF: Re: Antenna relays, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |