To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re[4]: LF: Re: Antenna relays |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:39:49 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <1C735FA296594DF897C48882843B0EB7@gnat> <CAA8k23QJA9cywxQHScDv8egMpCLqope-MgEv7Um3D5SG4tGS=w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A44476711@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <9A61F2B2E34C4D3DADDBC99E102D23E1@AGB> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
That's simple Chris , Triangulate the loop and use the mid base
tension , as a 450 ohm ladder fed, off centre fed wire top , quite a
classic Ae in its day , probably be lower noise for rx as well .. )
Other than that , the switching would need to be a drawn assy , I wonder , do plastic bicycle wheels conduct or have low values of permeability .... 73-G, -------------------------------------------------- From: "Chris Wilson" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:23 PM To: "Graham" <[email protected]> Subject: Re[4]: LF: Re: Antenna relays Hello Graham, Thursday, November 19, 2015Simpler to string something up for HF , away from the loop Chris ?73-G,Probably, but my loop works very well on HF, would be sad to lose it to just LF usage. If I had to run dual antennas I would probably keep the loop as HF and add a much higher LF one. But don't tell `er indoors, for Gawd's sake... -- Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: May be a increase in 477 OP8 activity over the next days, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: MF QSO IZ7EVZ, DK1IS |
Previous by Thread: | Re[4]: LF: Re: Antenna relays, Chris Wilson |
Next by Thread: | RE: Re[2]: LF: Re: Antenna relays, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |