To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:26:25 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAA8k23Rq-=2txqQMRCZ+ndQ7+kpS19-sKMQAVN0=as62N0Ju-g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Nice chart. I'm glad to see that you're getting some decodes down below zero Eb/N0, that's more like a proper test! Are you running with list size 200? There's about another dB of coding again available if you increase to 20000. Maybe that will fill in some of the gaps. Mostly these signals are too strong. If you can see EbNaut on a spectrogram, you don't need to be using it. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: USB TO SERIAL, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: USB TO SERIAL, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission, Domenico IZ7SLZ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |