Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission

[Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>]

Hi Andy,

 

thanks for sharing the link to Basil's beautiful web page. Last night his radio ghost appeared here numerous times, even though not in every ten-minute slot - see attached spectrogram and Eb/N0 plot.

 

All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- 
Von: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>; rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Di, 17 Nov 2015 11:50 pm
Betreff: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission

Ok, I'll leave it running overnight.   After  the rain stopped,  antenna resistance fell and power output rose closer to 300 Watts of RF  into the lower Rant, so EIRP is about +20dBm now.

To reiterate for any new readers:

   Frequency 137780.000  +/- 0.2mHz

   Coding 8K19A  

   Symbol period  0.5s   (2 symbols / sec)   BPSK with 10ms Gaussian  shaped phase transition

   Message length is 9 characters consisting of a callsign and the abbreviated name of a well-known cockatiel

PC time is synchronised using rsNTP,  set for periodic updates which it appears to do every 30 minutes.  So far it hasn't made a correction of more than 20ms (ignoring the first one back at 1611z)

The DOCXO (almost a TrOCXO)  appears to have stayed well within 1ppb of its correct frequency all afternoon / evening.   I check by comparing a divided down 1PPS signal against GPS,  looking to see how many microseconds the two respective edges drift apart over a few hours.   If it moves by more than that corresponding to 2 PPB   (7.2us per hour)  a slight tweak to the frequency control pot gets it back again.

For really serious work, the Caesium tube could be turned on, but that requires about 60 to 90 minutes for warm up to reach stable operation.    Something only worth doing for long duration tests at lower rates.  

The last part of the message comes from this chap, who's ghost still haunts my shack ...   http://www.g4jnt.com/basil.htm

Andy  G4JNT

On 17 November 2015 at 22:09, Markus Vester markusvester@aol.com [rsgb_lf_group] <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk> wrote:

 

 
I have set up a dedicated small SpecLab instance for EbNaut data, with spectrogram uploads to

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/EbNaut_spectrogram.png .

The signal is generally weaker now, but still good decodes (2.2 dB Eb/N0 for 21:00 UT). As far as I can see, transmit timing and frequency are perfect.

 

My auxiliary EbNaut utilities 

 http://df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/fec_tests/df6nm_ebnaut_utilities.zip

include opds-32 SpecLab settings, along with the text file containing info how to get-started. Hope it may be useful...

 

Best 73,

Markus (DF6NM)

 

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Di, 17 Nov 2015 6:54 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission

Andy,

 

getting even better... 56/704 symbol errors and 11.2 dB Eb/N0 for the 16:30 message.

 

I'm sure that Domenico will be able to pick up the signal in South Italy. Would anyone in TA-land want to attempt a decode tonight?

 

EbNaut_spectrogram_151118_0744.png
Description: PNG image

G4JNT_EbN0_151117-18.png
Description: PNG image