>> the humiliation of being a significant part of a mHz off QRG,

 

;-)   The upside is that such offsets are perfectly deterministic. Knowing your clocking scheme, and assuming that your controller always rounds to the next-lower frequency word, we find that 137477 is low at -629 uHz low, and 137777 only  -91 uHz, apparently matching observations. If you had chosen nearest integer rounding, 137477 would have been somewhat closer at +244 uHz ;-)

 

In the context of using PSK / Wolf modes with nonlinear amplifiers, DL4YHF had long ago included a continuous phase ramp option in SpecLab's digimode modulator. My conceptual problem is that I never know which way to swing around - at each transition one has to make an arbitrary decision between a low or high frequency spike...

 

 

All the best,

Markus (DF6NM)

 

 

From: [email protected]

Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:47 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: LF: Ramped BPSK

Hi Andy,

I was about to solder a dpdt relay across a transformer until I saw your
posting.  The DDS here is the 9851 and the 40 bits are loaded serially.
If bits 35-39 are changed from 00000 to 00010 the phase will change by
180 degrees and so the soldering iron can be switched off?

An AD9852 would spare me the humiliation of being a significant
part of a mHz off QRG, but these chips seem hard to get.  Markus was
right about the resolution. The DDS is clocked at 10 MHz with the
x6 multiplier. The output is then divided by 16.  The resolution is just
under 1 mHz and so the frequency error depends on the output frequency.

73 Joe VO1NA



On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Andy Talbot wrote:

> Try the Anlaog Devices web site - www.analog.com
>
> I built my own PCB,   http://www.g4jnt.com/AD9852module.pdf   (PCBs are no
> longer available for that, though).  That particular DDS is a bit out of
> date now.  I use it  for this job as I have a few modules left, and it is
> one of the few devices  with both a 48 bit frequency setting register and
> amplitude programmability.
>
> Andy  G4JNT
>
> On 14 November 2015 at 19:20, Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> With sufficiently brief phase steps, those discrete sidebands
>> will fall outside the loading coil bandwidth and be well
>> attenuated.
>>
>> But, does that bring back the audible clicks from the PA
>> and coil?
>>
>> I'm keen to have a play with these DDS chips.  Is there a
>> recommended evaluation board?
>>
>> --
>> Paul Nicholson
>> --
>>
>>
>