To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Ramped BPSK |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:00:54 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f3qCdVHToJ0TqTzONQjVaR8o29NIFc0e1Npr/+8MR6g=; b=nxohO7jCeMGivW/RSMMJMtHJhYBPqNgBXYrxzEnQN0zMnhYnvuVbDbuQ2ywcswKbSS OnGmvLA3bbcYsONLN0EInt34738rUDVARgAd9onDnW4ogSZcHXO2sDHoXB+kW+V6n+/3 VWZi9LX7ZtjAyYgAVkSmynXKJfqwQqJxCXboXnutF0/bPf9OSTuRoWoldK+bCBorPewC /OWbZ/mobegc7Olnp+exMb4XzOk4PXQzoeG7Dt9FHX/NghgQu/bSNG0tiPRC0THvo1IY zm1N3zkjczCtmjqHy9OG2YqCR0U5RjdazDjwwcO8kEbX+G3MQn8gGpMlyEGEiR0elYr7 QWFg== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAA8k23SKh84+0XXJfHxOVHWV7FgP+=oZXcuT79ye1Te24yqhdA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23QZnh4H+9H9kH-OpE8Uv2KV+Ujw=cSrYaSFN1VNTYNrwg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
You can just about get away with clocking the DDS directly for 137kHz. With and additional divide by 16, your DDS has to produce 2.2MHz which is within the capability of a DDS running at 10MHz clock. Just use a decent 5th or 7th order LP elliptic on its output and you can generate up to 3MHz from a 10MHz clock Then your step size will be 10E6 / 2^32 / 16 = 146uHz, and your accuracy worst case, half that at 73uHz Andy On 14 November 2015 at 20:47, <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Andy, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 630m Crossband Event, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re[4]: LF: Valve LF amps and tank coil size / voltage rating?, Chris Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Ramped BPSK, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Ramped BPSK, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |