| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: FR5ZX WSPR again |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:06:36 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <1E47139B8DD7469588956FCFFA3EBD9C@gnat> |
| References: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B27E40E@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<[email protected]> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B27F658@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <1E47139B8DD7469588956FCFFA3EBD9C@gnat> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Alan,I was not running a constant TX percentage. It was 20% at the beginning, then, after the first decodes i switched to 50% and + 3dB, later (as i went to bed) i went back to normal power and 33%. So the results are not unter constant parameters. Also we cannot expect constant hardware arrangements on the RX side i think. Some time he has to try to optimise things during decodable signals coming in. Yes, saturday night will be interesting. 73, Stefan Am 06.11.2015 01:54, schrieb Alan Melia: I noticed a set of regular 4min interval decodes then a 16 min blank which I presume must have been a fade. Also your best reception was soon after the fade I think??Fascinating stuff this LF/MF propagation :-)) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: MF 8S0DX, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: EA5DOM, DK7FC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: FR5ZX WSPR again, Roelof Bakker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: FR5ZX WSPR again, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |