Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Coherent BPSK on LF using EbNaut

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Coherent BPSK on LF using EbNaut
From: IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:57:51 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=wmhygmL+9iJ4LVHhYiMpiJhIFxWlFho5CjRjpcmcz5A=; b=Bcs1BLI53fEccxlmoJwACl4pmQJueAcU0DLwpMQDh2KcYVL13PwTl6AK2eLmuuypsr WRtECMievljMftyIoTvr8Czm3afQH5t40H2j1g+Uvqwc+WvdoC8FRwzqPXM3Z4LbpMCx ScscibaVv5TnajeNZSg6XS33MBxd3Nosd7I2L9nu7/Jx8MqoB/wa+EDVt7HG1EIOQuOI m3eR8fLK5iCZ6b0So+2+EsWv6y0hfWgglrDqrpHL4q/M2MIWAirWCxUWrPRfghF15QVJ USw94MYGzMY52/1GxK8Y42wMxaPAjCQPvDGqbaYMqnHH04bdaAZoMqNZWXD5VLi9y/RX /CPg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAA8k23T1or-Rgck+UAGo12413LATN-dNNQTAAAiggcVmWvbxhw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23Qmn7m9gZ3+BZMhW5G+qNwCrC=kzsK1pvKGvYuh4UmUnA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23Sxv8tWRXByE5xLM5Metq6KU=u0CAJXra3-waKWuYZrrg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23Rgs6Eq-OLdGXJLmbwLEyRvPnoLGanBW4mL9EUgygJzFg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Hallo Stefan,

thank you very much for your message.

On 10/1/2015 4:29 PM, DK7FC wrote:
Hi Domenico,

Thanks for your report.
I see you on my OPDS32 grabber, as you say.

2015-09-28 21:00:47 IZ7SLZ  1159km 137502.120Hz   1mHz -46.7dBOp  93% 17.9dB
2015-09-28 20:00:47 IZ7SLZ  1159km 137502.120Hz   2mHz -41.1dBOp  90% 20.4dB
2015-09-28 19:00:45 IZ7SLZ  1159km 137502.120Hz   5mHz -44.1dBOp  93% 18.8dB
2015-09-28 18:24:51 IZ7SLZ  1159km 137502.121Hz   2mHz -45.0dBOp  75% 15.2dB

Is 137502.120 Hz the frequency of your choice?  
YES. CONFIRM.
If your TX and my RX is GPS locked (or tracked) then where does the 1 mHz offset come from?
No. My Tx is not yet fully GPS-Locked but it is steered by an OCXO. That's why i need to check the frequency and make a small correction as done in the above OP32 sequence . After correction QRG remains quite steady for some hours.

Maybe a phase variation due to changing propagation?
The tests carried out so far show that the phase stability of the LF path is sufficient for  transmissions of at least 20-30 mins. Of course, it is  necessary to do many other tests with differents conditions (message and symbol lenght, QRB, hours, seasons,...)  in order to better understand the channel capability.
There is an interesting result achieved on Sept 14, 2015 with some my transmission of 43 characters at 0.2 s (duration = 7 min 47 s)  succesfully received by DF6NM. See:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kimklrv25sbmwiu/ebnaut_150914_results.zip?dl=0

Which offset is acceptable to avoid SNR losses in EbNaut (at a symbol rate that allows a QSO (in one evening! ;-) )) ?
Here i quote a Markus' observation regarding this question:

On LF, the frequency stability of the TX and RX local oscillators comes in as an additional variable. It is very important that these are known and stable to better than 1/message_duration (about a mHz for a 20 minute sequence), which requires either GPS locked oscillators, or a very good OCXO or Rubidium. To circumvent possible soundcard glitches on TX, it may actually be better to use a hardware oscillator (eg. a DDS on the final RF frequency).


73, Stefan   PS: Unfortunately not QRV on LF at the moment. I need to find a new loading coil body because my glass coil fully broke during maintenance attempts. Now i need something to come out with a stronger signal because each modification on the system has to be an improvement, by definition. So maybe i can come closer to 1W ERP then...

OK. We wait the restoration of your coil hoping that you want to try coherent bpsk. Your signal will be very useful for TA EbNaut test.

All the best

Domenico / iz7slz

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>