Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: LF: Protecting a MOSFET driver chip from MOSFET failure?

To: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Subject: Re[2]: LF: Protecting a MOSFET driver chip from MOSFET failure?
From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:28:53 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23S6O1-cw6TJ=+=4GTh2iPG=GY1nb9xXyg903fuYG62t9A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Gatesgarth Developments
References: <[email protected]> <CAA8k23SH41BrC=+NTy7PicsO+9giz+mwN5yYF7Ckg8bMsNZe0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23RzcYO9Y8=1_ZrUDYA0NH=XWBeSqtaZriyzR=En0Ag-sg@mail.gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A443E0BC1@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <CAA8k23S6O1-cw6TJ=+=4GTh2iPG=GY1nb9xXyg903fuYG62t9A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello Andy,

Monday, August 10, 2015


> No, capacitive coupling with diode restorationends up with
> near-enough  the same voltage applied to the gate as you had in thr first 
> place.


> A 0/12v output from the driver chips ends up at -0.7 /+ 11.3 V (assuming 0.7V 
> diode drop)




> As for the question of the dual drive with resistors.    The
> resistors may as well say in, just to smooth off edges and reduce
> dissipation in the driver.     i doubt you'll notice any difference.


> Andy  G4JNT

OK, thanks and sorry for the naive questions, lots to learn, I was
amused by my friend calling power FET's "Fire Emitting Transistors". I
see his point now, they do go with a good bang and sizzle! The wife
smelt them downstairs and asked wearily if it meant a longer wait
before a job she attached great importance to, but I classed as a
boring irrelevance, got done...







-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>