Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF
From:	edgar <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2015 23:36:27 +1000
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<AC666FAFFAF340258B396B3B6D0949A6@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

Hi Joe,

Try reducing the minimum amplitude range and see if that helps.

On the Spectrum ..(2) tab.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?, (continued) Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?, Graham LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?, Graham LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Markus Vester Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Graham Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Steinar Aanesland Re: Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Tobias DG3LV Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Steinar Aanesland Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Markus Vester LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, jcraig Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar <= Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, jcraig Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, DK7FC Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, jcraig Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, DK7FC Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF FIXED (I think), jcraig Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF FIXED (I think), edgar RE: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, VIGILANT Luis Fernández Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, wolf_dl4yhf

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Interesting 630M WSPR night, pa3abk
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, jcraig
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]