Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?
From: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:15:50 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <FD8C317627A54A858DBA63792369CCC3@White> <[email protected]> <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
May thanks for the files Paul!

Paul Nicholson wrote:
> Well that 24dB is a 5 hour integration in 55uHz.  It
> makes a big sharp line on the spectrum though.  At
> VLF that counts as 'armchair'.

Yes. It will never become a popular "realtime chat mode" of course...


> No problem.  5 hours compressed into 22.5 seconds
> and frequency shifted so that 29499 Hz is moved
> to 400 Hz.  wav format 32k samples/sec mono 1.4 Mbyte
> 
>  http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303a.wav
> 
> How good is your 'CW ear' I wonder?

Not exactly armchair copy but by looping the file a couple of times for
"mental integration" I got XBA XBA XBA without any doubt. Yes, the
second file wh2xba1_140303b.wav was slightly easier to read due to the
higher CW speed. Thank you for the music Bob!

An MFSK system with integrate-and-dump detectors synchronized to the TX
should be capable of conveying quite a number of bits per hour. The low
speed would allow many tones in a small BW. Some tones could even be
reserved for commonly used words or sentences like "It is not raining in
Tokyo also" :-)

73
Johan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>