Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?

from [Paul Nicholson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:28:16 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <FD8C317627A54A858DBA63792369CCC3@White> <[email protected]> <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 

Determined listeners might try this one.  This is last
night's transmission, 9 hours starting 2014-03-04 23:00 and
the time compression ratio is the same (x800)

 http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303b.wav

The Morse is faster on this one which might help.   You can
hear the background noise ebb away near the end (08:00) as
dawn arrives here.

I'm finding this one a bit easier to read.
--
Paul Nicholson
--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Paul Nicholson
Next by Date:  LF: Snowloading, Laurence KL7 L
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Paul Nicholson
Next by Thread:  RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, hvanesce
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]