Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: MW Antenna [was:RE: Clemens on MF!!]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: MW Antenna [was:RE: Clemens on MF!!]
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:31:24 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <F2AAC492D14A4A14B655BD668431D0E7@Clemens0811>
References: <[email protected]> <35FE4D7949D24153B93AD287570B1AA6@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <07DCC8F8EED14FA7A932FF8F90ED27A6@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <34613E4DA8F14D389A2BCF8A04DDF0DA@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <E2DE4EC9105C43E0847B31050309F109@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <81046BF0DF784FB18751214A2CE7347A@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <F2AAC492D14A4A14B655BD668431D0E7@Clemens0811>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Clemens,

I can see all the solar modules on the neighbours roofs. That may be a reason for the QRM (?). I think if you can manage to create an earth system in http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=JN68KJ79XH at the current feed point of the antenna and then use a coax cable and an isolation transformer or a separate primary winding on the variometer coil body then the QRM may be even lower than in the dipole configuration :-)

73, Stefan

Am 20.01.2014 21:45, schrieb Clemens Paul:
Hi Stefan,

+6 dB, so now you're getting twice the antenna current with
the same power?
No,only about 10% more (calculated) as the VSWR is a bit better.
R went from ~60 Ohm to 50 Ohm,reactance being cancelled out.
The increase in signal strength by 6dB comes from reduced ground losses due
to vertical polarization as opposed to horizontal polarization in dipole mode.

Can you show us the image showing your house and the antenna again? I
Attached once more for convenience (see also link at the end).
Red traces = dipole legs (2x155m)
Yellow trace = open wire feeder (42m)

remember there was a coax of some 10m between TX and dipole feed point
That must be someone different. -:)
Here the feeder runs directly into the shack,vertical part about 6m.
So in T-Antenna mode there's quite a bit of top load...

Let's see how I can manage the earth problem.
I believe for reception I will further stay with the dipole mode because it's 
extremely
quiet ( -110dBm or true ~S3 in 200Hz BW) due to careful balancing and its remote
location from the houses.
When receiving I can afford up to 10-15dB signal loss on MW without
degrading SNR.

http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN68KJ79WJ

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>