Hi Wolf,
you started with solid S7 but later qsb made things a bit more difficult.
And I still need some practice to better read plain text.
Usual abbreviations are a lot easier...
The dipole is a horizontal 90°V, 8-15m high and according to EZNEC it has a
spheroidal
pattern with no nulls.
The vertical part of the feeder is only about 6m long.
Tomorrow I'll check the impedance of the antenna aagainst ground with both
feeder wires
connected
and see if I can match it to 50 Ohm,dependent on the available parts.
I have also a K9AY for reception here,which is vertically polarized and
switchable
in four directions (N/S/W/E) .
In 99% the dipole always wins hands down when I compare both antennas.
Thanks and
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wolf_dl4yhf
>Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:33 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!!
>
>Hi Clemens,
>
>thanks for the new QSO. An additional quarter-Neper helps a
>lot :o), and
>I can imagine that my 100 W PEP (which I use when @ home) / 60 m wire
>antenna, the signal wasn't so easy to copy. My question was if, for
>comparison, you can connect the wires of your dipole so they form a
>large top-hat, i.e. a vertical antenna without nulls in some direction.
>
>All the best and have a nice weekend,
> Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD .
>
>
|
