Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: Article on VLF

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Article on VLF
From: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:29:13 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to; bh=KmAny8DQKeldCgKCavDm1OHVftXcnzs9asB32b6zylc=; b=0uVDUWJxd8NEJFFb0SCzJh3H1ybyM6Qh2Cx1hL4abGX2uEuyzVn1a/3wFzUzMBXFEf IYwSasKBQbPcJ20XoteQGPWAekw2h5ww6KQdx0kM/yzqDmzejsic3rph8CrXCDD9Y3Pf C3LzyA/LvRfvb3uixdEhkG0APlGeOu3/LSLNoBB0eodep8A5v9rybGDcXpw/MjcVeK/R 5rIgaMX3hHof16m6sUhrFemnmIHkynUdP20yC7xDgZy/PxlqKnjJ3J9kVgy9ssVa2fpd gXHE5Hs/FNcnjWS/OgGdDfjQFSpmSudjvDQ+49rBKRy1iEicHgZuHcrYNsykhKkG6JjZ YbHQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I think I understand the term “dispersion” in the optical context and how there 
 could be a similar mechanism at VLF. My main reasons for posting are:

1) an interest is reduced-bandwidth speech systems at cave radio frequencies 
(typically 87 kHz)
2) the resilience of such systems when used in the presence of impulsive 
interference such as LORAN – a problem which is widespread in north-west Europe
3) there are also systems which work at VLF and are intended for subterranean 
location. A typical carrier frequency appears to be of the order of 3 kHz, and 
I wonder if a simple SSB system on 3.3 kHz USB system might give useful range 
(a few hundred metres) for voice communication.
4) Some Australian amateurs have been experimenting with digital voice systems 
(codec2?) on HF and it seems to be possible this approach might also be useful.

John F5VLF

On 3 Dec 2013, at 10:16CET, hvanesce <[email protected]> wrote:

> It might be informative to consider exploitation and mitigation of
> dispersion in approaches to compression for VLF links.
> 
> Jim AA5BW 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>