Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:45:43 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <43D5229E1A7F4158BF27A01B1FAF6E4D@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Times  change   












--------------------------------------------------
From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:45 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test

> On 09/02/2013 19:31, Graham wrote:
>> Did some one  mention  Opera ?
>>
> Must have been a Phantom.
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:22 PM
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test
>>
>>>
>>> Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo:
>>>> No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for
>>>> weeks.
>>>
>>> Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally
>>> sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which
>>> was synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument
>>> for Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at
>>> home with my own transmissions...
>>>
>>>> PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been
>>>> growing recently.
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>>> Pictures please!
>>>> Oh dear do you really like rats nests?
>>> ...and dirty fingers, yes ;-)
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eddie
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>