Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[5]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re[5]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?
From: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:19:31 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357301979; bh=vCUDiTOQzM814WTEYp3+pGnCgkUrBDLSwIqRSBBxD8k=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=sU+wXTtXv06o3AlkKZS+HOJnr6DC+9Al60XgIZjiQtaHJOa2JUBId4c0pR+dmEOjjUGgHXIWkhC0QGjpsyAuHiRQGU1hLAtULA8yLL+9UUHRYY8+uukz9+zVp65g2F8aotyUNhUcuPvtK4B4/dmW6/jiyIH6LD5N0HmYCYfL+dk=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: eM_Client/4.0.15145.0
Pete, I live within the law and hope I have respect for other people and users of the spectrum. Your attitude to band plans is a perfect example of what is wrong with the hobby.
 
Colin - M5FRA
 


------ Original Message ------
From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 04/01/2013 11:57:13
Subject: Re: Re[3]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?
Hi Colin
 
What century do you live in? The days of deference are long long gone. It is a right to have access to the RF spectrum there is no privilege about it. We accept governmental control in a self interested way. The CBers taught us that!
 
Having said that you have a right to your opinion of couse. But  band planning it's like the family trees in companies, you are given one when you join and over time find out how the outfit really runs and it usually looks nothing like that nice neat box chart!! And so it will be on 472/9.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: M5FRA - Colin <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013, 11:07
Subject: Re[3]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?

I am sorry but I did not express myself very clearly in the last couple of posts and there were lots of typos. I will attempt to explain why I am opposed to digital voice/SSB on 630m.
 
The main reason is that although it is technically possible it is impractical as it will take up a disproportionate amount of bandwidth which will effectively deny other people the space to operate.
 
The idea that it could be daylight hours only, VOX only etc etc as a gentlemen’s agreement is wildly optimistic in light of the abuse of the other gentlemen’s agreements called bandplans.
 
I also feel strongly that we are on the bands as a privilege and not a right. I know for sure that there is a lot of abuse of license conditions and have heard ops openly admit to running 1kw+ in order to work DX or to ‘level the playing field’ in contests. That sort of abuse will only do us harm and although some argue that Ofcom are not interested in such things let me assure you that they are.
 
The new 630m band is allocated on a secondary basis to aeronautical mobile users. There are still NDBs within the band and some countries impose restriction or deny access to 630m altogether because of the shared use. It will only take somebody to either accidentally or deliberately QRM to an aeronautical user for us to lose the band or face more restrictions. I can see the headlines now!
 
Finally, and I will not post here again on this subject, I am not anti SSB, anti contests, anti much else, but do believe we need a responsible attitude to how we use the bands. We should not be constantly pushing for change to suit our own interests or deliberately flouting the law, in the long term that will only lead to loss of privilege not more access.
 
And to answer an aggressive direct email which suggested I **** off and play somewhere else, yes I do operate digital modes and have done for 40+ years starting with a Creed 7B. I also use SSB, CW, QRP and QRO and even microwaves.
 
Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>