Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? |
| From: | "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:24:43 +0000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357287888; bh=7erwUIPvw5+YVfacN2fxKcVySknBexUeQEvXxuMmjw8=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=1gcnNTl6hHHx+pBaVkfufEIm2/7pkrH1e0nMXyvdeu8jxBy4V//2vtKpivtyAz3u8TmBc4G980cFxWon8qKvAIGYZ86owDo8AeD/akS5q/66I4ceiy0iF8HCifFamc9DacPxtyqyAAzDFq3tOHopb7IVSXxNJRFOnvCbMPk7Czw= |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | eM_Client/4.0.15145.0 |
|
Just a thought.....when it gets totally washed out with SSB all 24 hours how are you going to clean it out? People in general dont follow gentlemen's agreements they were not party too.....and "it doesnt say I cant in the licence".
I fear that, though what you suggest would work, it might encourage mayhem. I agree with Alan. What is wrong with top band for local chats? Or the acres of unused space on 2m or 70cms? To consider using any form of SSB on 630m just because it might be technically feasible if sheer lunacy. IMHO it would kill the band for other modes and the potential for QRM to other users will be high. As an ex G8 who learned Morse in spite of a chronic medical condition I would say just get on a do it. The rewards are well worth the effort. Or maybe effort is a dirty word?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: WSPR TA, Albert W |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?, Chris |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: WSPR TA, Albert W |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?, Chris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |