Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5
From:	M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:05:57 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1351461957; bh=TjrBFWEa5TIzo+6CD7klFeM8UE4y5WT3xrIwRQ/pFig=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p4cp8hTOxNAWlQrE1Aos02w6Ok0WyQxH/BlwyByKYwfjEuzD/zVu5HIC5jBAhGySKNBXFPVfNKvNXT4C0AwhViNjMoWdilvKqNJtcPbSU09qwq6lZqTptI7Tb54JPbdf/hVCP0yW7PoqG1oZzmG03jEg85eU2/MGkiMjMZJRx+A=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nT+A9AN1gAD+A9+FS+zdG9gsi2GGy0g5vGsMuGecQFYK+Pn0UCcg1pPqilvBUouhnbZWMBg4eq8tbN3TP82ZnYkVw1RBgwxflphUh4nDxiDJAxESNNs4UMLYBbjgCLyw2ZLQ+bpOBxzW9fgTCD3qyolbi58UcE0B32W/Vf2qK9k=;
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Wolf

I thought it was selective fading but the lower was always better over long periods (2 hours) but has been strong here now and appears to have equal side bands now. It appears variable....... confused! Accidental Phasing SB TX ?

RX here using TS690s with both filters (250hz) in and also using Winrad with the RX in wide IF mode appeared to be the same result.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX

From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, 28 October 2012, 21:26
Subject: Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5

Hi Pete,

Am 28.10.2012 22:03, schrieb M0FMT:

Hi All

also NDB "BIA" 474 Rzeszow / Jasionka at 1000miles better Lower sideband than upper sb?

ah, confirmed... I thought I was the only one where "BIA" showed this behaviour. First blamed it on my receiver's passband, but then noticed the same happened with a Perseus and an SDR-IQ. But I think they add both sidebands 'synthetically', not with an old-fashioned AM modulator (with audio modulation transformer or similar).

73,
Wolf (qrt on LF / WSJT)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: LF: no decodes, help needed, (continued) RE: LF: no decodes, help needed, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Steinar Aanesland Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Steinar Aanesland Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Steinar Aanesland LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, M0FMT Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, M0FMT <= Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, Roelof Bakker Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Markus Vester Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Stefan Schäfer LF: DF6NM decodings, Joe Re: LF: DF6NM decodings, Stefan Schäfer AW: LF: DF6NM decodings, Joe Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, wolf_dl4yhf

Previous by Date:	LF: G3XIZ strong in Norway, Steinar Aanesland
Next by Date:	LF: JT9 vs.WSPR, jrusgrove
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, wolf_dl4yhf
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: DJ9!E and DF5QG CW 0n 472.5, Roelof Bakker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]