To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re : LF: DK0SWF antenna |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:44:20 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1347140661; bh=9HxMa8DZ7tGZ4eBvkRVoiiBDxiz+MUR5GriS88ZIoBg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P31DzkXT35bQPUTQXZMZlqombXAEXAodT+FqYWCUdzuElRkM6nMqvWsZdBMQM5EOX uY0UF4g/Gmdf4jFNC46Cy4NrljlS7ZBISd+WN4Sfxgg1LEvJkF0/c71QnTxZhwBR3U rMWtom1I3D5b61EASWAx38SHAIf54zUMfHuqvWiw= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Very strong signal here, beautifull MF activation.
Why do they use a broadcast antenna ? The end of SWF ?
F4DTL Nicolas
-----E-mail d'origine-----
De : pa3abk <[email protected]> A: blacksheep <[email protected]> Envoyé le : Sa, 8 Sep 2012 21:46 Sujet : LF: DK0SWF antenna Scanning the CW band 472-7kHz a strong, I mean very strong signal was heard from DK0SWF on 472,5. He was listening mostly on 80m. At 1930 he was QRT signing of after a short QSX 503. Didn't manage to work him :-( Checked internet and his location was here : http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49AV60ER Looking to the sat picture a "large" antenna was showed, which explained the strong sigs. If you are reading this reflector, do you really use this array? Jan/pa3abk -- pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it
CQ DK0SWF CW 2.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna, KKorn42 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Dial frequency - or better not?, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | LF: DK0SWF, Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK0SWF antenna, Clemens Paul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |