To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:34:06 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> |
References: | <[email protected]> <C58324464DB74908908940561AD41698@AGB> <[email protected]> <A8B9B40838544BDD964CE6620E37E211@AGB> <[email protected]> <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
JimThere is 3 dB gain in each X2 time step , I think without using path simulator or similar these are a little subjective .. the reading is the average over the tx time. G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:11 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: Cats among pigeons Dear Eddie, LF Group,So what you are saying is that the actual SNR at the decode/no decode threshold is the same for Op8 and Op4, but that the SNR indicated by Op8 at this level is 3dB lower than that indicated by Op4?Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, qrss |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, Albert |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |