The worse question you could ask.
The decodes fall off at the same signal level resulting from the same TX
Power, however OP8 reports -31dB and OP4 reports -28dB I call that
worse. In other words I had a -37dB report from ON6EO, sounds good but
would OP4 have been -34dB.
I know you knew what I meant anyway.
E
On 09/02/2012 20:29, Graham wrote:
worse ? is that worse as in fails to decode or decodes at a
worse s/n ? , perhaps worst was the worst word to use to
describe a worsening situation , by only making things worse ?
G..
--------------------------------------------------
From: "qrss" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 7:57 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Cats among pigeons
Yes OP8 decodes but almost always either equal S/N or worse.
E
On 09/02/2012 19:40, Graham wrote:
Interesting Ed.
I would go for OP2 on 500 , that was the speed that
produced the best results at the start , did you have any OP8
decodes?
G.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "qrss" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 7:13 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Cats among pigeons
This one worked before also on the G3ZJO G0KTN path:-
After dark QSB starts on 500kHz even OP4 can become a struggle, the
PA0AM path again.
18:52 18105 PA0AM Op1 -22 dB 322 km Actually on 500kHz
18:50 18105 PA0AM Op2 -25 dB 322 km Actually on 500kHz
18:41 18105 PA0AM Op2 -18 dB 322 km Actually on 500kHz
This could explain why WSPR does so well.
Eddie G3ZJO
|
