Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Cats among pigeons

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Cats among pigeons
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:20:08 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bpfh7ziA1IfaFSBMRK2/xcraMoFb2cXg0nPbFiKcMmY=; b=le1A0HzMInjBosVwP6phd3KvI2pKeWG0roHpI12V9TEpjgDRDlht71HVCH3dDYRHuX w9sVTv3bHikP7WwWCMlWF7b45ke63Fb4rX41r/kzNVXhsZTvavbBjQ45HHSOzA4N6bbm vfs3VzMBbWq1EhZUPbCT4mykpObBjl6hJ46WE=
In-reply-to: <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC>
References: <[email protected]> <C58324464DB74908908940561AD41698@AGB> <[email protected]> <A8B9B40838544BDD964CE6620E37E211@AGB> <[email protected]> <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
The reported S/N (normalised to 2500Hz) for each mode should be the
same; the decoding threshold is different in proportion to teh speed.

If the reported value is consistently and  systematically out, either
there's a big mistake in the software decoding, or there are other
factors coming into play.

'jnt



On 9 February 2012 21:11, James Moritz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Eddie, LF Group,
>
> So what you are saying is that the actual SNR at the decode/no decode
> threshold is the same for Op8 and Op4, but that the SNR indicated by Op8 at
> this level is 3dB lower than that indicated by Op4?
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>