Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons |
| From: | qrss <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:12 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <C58324464DB74908908940561AD41698@AGB> <[email protected]> <A8B9B40838544BDD964CE6620E37E211@AGB> <[email protected]> <1659D80990BC4B5482FF78B6249AACAF@JimPC> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 |
Hi JamesYes that is what I consider I have been observing and with the help of Trevor and Cor testing to the best of our ability with a 3dB TX power step from decode to no decode, during steady signal conditions this afternoon and visible QSB this evening. E On 09/02/2012 21:11, James Moritz wrote: Dear Eddie, LF Group,So what you are saying is that the actual SNR at the decode/no decode threshold is the same for Op8 and Op4, but that the SNR indicated by Op8 at this level is 3dB lower than that indicated by Op4?Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, James Moritz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Cats among pigeons, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |