To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 73kHz |
From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:59:51 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JW0unF+9U0UYZdHbXLxewwk4vTT1i2xG3ddEVZiI/5Q=; b=FRTAzYe0QtO6alSWznJiZbTK6hreIbVdAP2a+hbK0TMG93xdA95M4UJZri2BjD8sN7 nywxeuyZOzfo4T8WeDC4QI7VlkIcc5SZ35mwjKtMhNPsVL3Yg853u0jRIpFfiUUHbnWj VravDya41he7qJBxMX/FgN/5da02+A0Giq2tM= |
In-reply-to: | <46DFDA4628A84E3DA2E5C4A96AD081AB@JimPC> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAO19VgMEjRxDTsuSveG_6nmD2gcMnfYGzGvWULD4RE=U9eDtkA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00fc01cc8d21$dc5fba00$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> <46DFDA4628A84E3DA2E5C4A96AD081AB@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
At the risk of starting a backlash from people here saying, "don't spread the activity even more thinly", is it worth a serious push for 73kHz to be made available again in the UK by NoV? If the allocation is quiet then surely on a strictly limited access, low ERP, basis and for a limited time there might be some possibility? For 8.7-9.1kHz we managed to persuade OFCOM to talk with the Met Office, and several of us did so directly to argue our cases, and the outcome was positive and in not too many months. I know we have discussed this before. 73 (yes please!) Roger G3XBM On 18 October 2011 18:34, James Moritz <[email protected]> wrote: Dear Stefan, LF Group, -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 73kHz, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 73kHz, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 73kHz, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 73kHz, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |