Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...
From: "henny van elst" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:27:07 +0200
References: <[email protected]> <67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto> <008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto> <op.vz0iyui5yzqh0k@pc-roelof> <1313033619.1543.20.camel@gerhard-desktop> <[email protected]> <00c401cc5826$49523e70$71a9c00a@Clemens04> <1313074781.1701.7.camel@gerhard-desktop> <[email protected]> <1313090065.1579.46.camel@gerhard-desktop>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Hello Gerhard,
can You give me the addres to order a fiberglasmast?

henny pa3cpm
best 73's

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerhard Hickl" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...


John!

Actually there is no special guying used since the mast is only the
lower (and thus thicker) section of an originally 10m high "cheap"
Fibreglass-Pole like available at http://www.dx-wire.de/fiberglasm.htm

It is tied to the chimney with two tension belts which are commonly used
to fix cargo in a truck. (1 inch wide).

Originally this method of fixing to the chimney was just thought to be
for testing but meanwhile it is up there for more than a year.

The two probes (LF/VLF) on top of the mast are suspended by a string
which enables me to maintain the probes without bringing the pole down.

73
OE3GHB
Gerhard









Am Donnerstag, den 11.08.2011, 17:58 +0200 schrieb John Rabson:
Gerhard,

What guying arrangements do you use for the 5m mast, please?

73
John F5VLF

On 11 Aug 2011, at 16:59CEST, Gerhard Hickl wrote:

> Clemens, LF group!
>
> This is exactly the opposite that I experienced with the Mini-Whip.
>
> The higher I brought it up (= the farther I brought it away from the
> noise source, commonly called "house"), the better the SNR.
>
> Today I connected the shield of the cable to the lightning protection
> system up on the roof and couldn't find any difference so far.
>
> I'm using a 5m fibre-glass pole fixed to the chimney as a support for
> the probe and the shield of the feeder is only grounded in the shack.
>
> 73
>
> OE3GHB
> Gerhard
>
>
>
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.08.2011, 13:32 +0200 schrieb Clemens Paul:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>>> The pole that is on a noisy roof (and its noisy ground) and on the >>> other side >>> the pole that is far away in the garden, with its own and clean local >>> earth.
>>> In the garden a metallic pole should make no difference, as you say.
>>
>> How true.
>> My miniwhip was completely unusable on the top of my roof,
>> with or without connecting the coax shield to the lightning
>> gr.. ehm reference plane.
>> So I decided to put it in the middle of thegarden where it is only >> 30cm
>> above the lawn.
>> Here connecting the coax braid to a 3m long earth rod was essential
>> to get rid of the noise.
>> Now this setup is good enough for receiving SAQ with up to 30dB S/N.
>>
>> 73
>> Clemens
>> DL4RAJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...
>>
>>
>>> Hi Gerhard,
>>>
>>> I think one has to compare two different situations:
>>>
>>> The pole that is on a noisy roof (and its noisy ground) and on the >>> other side >>> the pole that is far away in the garden, with its own and clean local >>> earth.
>>> In the garden a metallic pole should make no difference, as you say.
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11.08.2011 05:33, schrieb Gerhard Hickl:
>>>> Roelof!
>>>>
>>>> With interest I was following all the discussions about the "Mini
>>>> Whip"-like antennas.
>>>>
>>>> In your description of the "PA0RDT Mini Whip" you suggest to use a >>>> non
>>>> metallic pole for mounting the probe and an (optional) earth-rod to
>>>> ground (sorry Andy!!) the shield.
>>>>
>>>> I might be completely wrong but isn't it the same when one uses a
>>>> grounded metallic pole and connect the shield of the coax on top of >>>> this
>>>> pole?
>>>>
>>>> BTW: I have an insulating pole (5m) on top of the roof and yet no
>>>> grounded shielding of the coax but just in the shack. I will connect >>>> the >>>> shield to the lightning protection system at the bottom of the pole >>>> and
>>>> see about the difference.
>>>>
>>>> Actually it isn't even a true coax cable but a singe shielded >>>> twisted
>>>> pair where the two inner wires are in parallel....Z=? Who knows????
>>>>
>>>> So considering my "fluffy" set-up, I think my VLF grabber is >>>> performing
>>>> very well but for sure there is room for improvements as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> OE3GHB
>>>> Gerhard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 21:26 +0200 schrieb Roelof Bakker:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Minto, Stefan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Some food for thoughts:
>>>>>
>>>>> When I tested a mini-whip in the garden with battery feed and also >>>>> with a
>>>>> battery fed SLM, I found the noise lower than when used inside and
>>>>> operated from the mains.
>>>>>
>>>>> The coax cable from the house station was connected in parallel >>>>> with the
>>>>> mini-whip by means of a BNC T-piece.
>>>>> The noise increased by 9 dB. My assumption is that this noise is >>>>> received
>>>>> on the shield of the coax inside the house.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without connecting the shield to a separate radio earth, the noise
>>>>> received on the shield inside the house will travel over the shield >>>>> all >>>>> the way to the antenna. There the noise will be received by the >>>>> sensitive >>>>> probe. This will be by means of capacitively coupling, I guess. >>>>> Many >>>>> people have reported a large drop in local noise by connecting the >>>>> shield
>>>>> at the bottom of the mast.
>>>>> This also applies to normal active whips of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> Roelof, pa0rdt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> eMail ist virenfrei.
>>> Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
>>> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virendatenbank: 1520/3826 - Ausgabedatum: >>> 10.08.2011
>>
>>
>
>
>
>







-----
Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1392 / Virusdatabase: 1520/3827 - datum van uitgifte: 08/11/11




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>