Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:57:30 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1314744991; bh=Oc7oVisqYh+J1AzFuB3n07QzenXH/f1L+lsTAqneVJw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=xfJYcXskzGOaEid70cAvTZOYEQstguwSLvGMHZIygMDJmBhqn5OYExGNGxWSpXwqjlRdN0bpOcA4yZYWKqOfL4o3UumyDBJItp+RpvtsZ0JS9dqA6488eEQhBiSSSdWHG8LXnysOUvBu7OTmEmHA/CTk/ibXINUHluhDhfJ/dB0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=L6WHsdUbR0o4SdmJNHRXIf6FSbgZMVbWigBIH2zuCUi4NjlyhUG2C6BVer6rHxiKEetpb3gibigJFY3Ep+PIKAus7/t8lf8upn+5CuuO/81PecYRw90b0wuvrD1sCSJU0CgDUT51o50Rfr64TqDxic958zoskux0rIygmnBdvCs= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Peter, LF Group,----- Original Message ----- From: "pws" <[email protected]> These rods are working fine even at VLF. But according to my own experiences in the late 90th bundling is not worth the effort. Two tight (!) stacked 15cm rods achieved better SNR compared to a bundle of 7 rods. I would be interested to know what method you used to determine SNR for the different rod configurations. In my experiments, the difficult thing is to measure the noise level of the antenna itself, due to the fact that it *is* an antenna and usually picks up plenty of noise from external sources. The "dummy antenna" consisting of a screened inductor with the same inductance and Q as the rod works OK, but not very convenient if you want to try several different rod configurations with varying L and Q. Another possibility is a screened enclosure to exclude all external fields, but that would have to be quite big not to de-tune or increase losses in the antenna, as you mentioned. Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: ROS, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: ROS, John P-G |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |