To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:54:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314705291; bh=ZK/JtxB4DTZw5AnxAMo052ULI9gfMTs34ZkRjP7b14c=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EQ22wxWO/ecHlMLN7u6e2FGwglWWNQETe4vRjEpe01X98eTGaaP3XO992gvHunhzYGxLIsxjXV8ymtEU+CDZpfCp0tG8DprhLcphpdU1IJQvVyuMfP572VNyNwl91ePLVuqD2mZlPB4n0Mpykx9RaUyHvNmCSOJq2oqni5Omcao= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HK7vSgXS4GTlOHiFlDbLpytzY9dmdOddzGlqX7lUX4L63H4Jh+v+nJqEI9BRGTiUs6AJIwmZk9kSD5jDzBhCZBujkx5mEL476oJeVBcqs8Z5TmhvJD7fbInNslG9TaGL+0noSnMp0yT49lwM8Q8NN+R+QZRqKkOLcgO8rF7k8Fc=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Stefan,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Yesterday evening a purchased a bunch of 7 x MU400HH ferrites (10mm x 200mm each) on eBay, planning to join them together "in parallel" to form a fatter rod, no idea if it will be a good choice but let's play with this new toy ;-) Meanwhile I'm collecting ideas and hints from the web about construction (shielding, computing/measuring parameters, ect.). Projects are stacking as usual :-)
Best regards
Daniele
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:34 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? Hi Daniele, I think it is no problem. A narrow band but adjustable antenna is a good choice. Just use a large variable cap, e.g. 2x500 pF. It may be helpful to use switched caps and a smaller variable cap like i did. If you have a high Q antenna, you can then easily fine tune the system. So maybe 5...100 pF +100 pF+180 pf+270 pF+560 pF or so, depending on your L. Yes, very suitable. I have exactly these types in my LF ferrite antenna and got a Q of 480. Q will change over the frequency. So maybe it is even helpful to realise a switched L, for the higher frequencies. 73, Stefan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPRnet.org?, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Ferrite wideband antennas?, hajo . brandt . dj1zb |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |