To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? |
From: | pws <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:17:03 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
Hi again Daniele, I forgot some words about shielding.Do not use solid sheet. I just built a small receiver for rtty at 147 kHz for weather report reception when sailing. Using a fine looking u-shaped copper shield the signal went down of some 10 dB even if spaced 4 cm apart from the rod. And it did not improve the SNR considerably. Using an envelope from old SCSI flatline soldered together only at one side the SNR went up of >10 dB inside the house. The effect is incredible. My guess is that Eddy currents are responsible for this. So if possible shield your ferrite antenna coil by a "feathered", comb-like structure with multiple conductors running in parallel around the rod. They may overlap some cm if isolated. And in contrast to solid shielding distance doesn't matter. Peter, df3lp |
Previous by Date: | LF: ROS MF-2 BEACON 500KHz usb, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Ferrite rod antenna - on-air testing, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Daniele Tincani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |