Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:50:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <0FA38FC9F88F41738D007D00C0B66503@PcMinto>
References: <[email protected]> <67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto> <008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <0FA38FC9F88F41738D007D00C0B66503@PcMinto>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Wow, what a discussion. Havent read all the comments so far but just a short answer to Minto:

Am 10.08.2011 17:01, schrieb Minto Witteveen:
A choke (only) at the TX would accomplish nothing (in fact it may even make it worse).
There must have been a misunderstanding. I did not say that only a choke without grounding is a good solution.
The antenna must be grounded at the far end too(garden, pole), as we all say.

Maybe its better to do the discussion on the band, in a nice and long CW QSO! Full BK would be useful i think ;-) This bewares us to write longer and longer mails, commenting the comments and add new issues that will be commented later, hi.

Better spending the time for practical experiments.



Have you done further optimisations today? :-)

Best 73 es CU sn

Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>