| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message |
| From: | Chris Trayner <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 May 2011 18:19:02 +0100 |
| Accept-language: | en-US, en-GB |
| Acceptlanguage: | en-US, en-GB |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | AcwRkdqbA6Z3QJrBScGMaLwZqaenLQ== |
| Thread-topic: | LF: RE: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message |
On 13 May 2011, at 18:05, Dave G3WCB. wrote: More info here, including a nice coverage map. 100w goes a loooong way... At least, when one realises that 120 nm means nautical miles, not nanometres ;-) Many of those long distances are at aircraft heights, where the jammer will be line-of-sight. I remember hearing the first amateur radio from a Shuttle: they were using about 2W on 2m, range nearly 1000km, and we picked it up on a Slim Jim into an ordinary rig. Signal as clear as if it had been from the next village. 73, Chris G4OKW ----------------------- Dr Chris Trayner School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 34 32053 Fax: +44 113 34 32032 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message, Dave G3WCB. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message, Dave G3WCB. |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Ofcom Update: GPS Jamming Message, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |