|
Chris
I would suggest you increase power so that those further
away migh detect your signal. Going QRP is a backward
step
I have now diverted my antenna back to 500 and worked
M0BMU/P and PA3ABK
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 4:29
PM
Subject: Re: LF: G3XIZ today?
Thanks for the ongoing reports Roger.
It's odd
that despite the same settings and aerial current here my reports seem
to vary quite widely from day to day.
I'm wondering what the other
variables are . . .
I'm preparing a spread sheet of my VLF
reports and will send you a copy when it's done.
There's no
problem with my reducing power and at 15.30Z (16.30 UK clock) I'll
reduce the PA current to 1/10th its present setting.
73 Chris
G3XIZ
--- On Sun, 27/3/11, Roger Lapthorn
<[email protected]> wrote:
From:
Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF:
G3XIZ today?
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 27
March, 2011, 15:56
Chris Judging by your signal level, you
might just be detectable here with 10-20dB less, especially if I wound
the RX bandwidth down a bit more. We should try this sometime. It
would be impressive to detect you with real QRP at your
end. 73s Roger G3XBM
On 27 March 2011 15:53, Roger
Lapthorn <[email protected]>
wrote:
Chris
Your
good signal continues.
Using Spectrum Lab at 424uHz
bandwidth certainly does the trick. BTW I also looked for you with
Spectran in QRSS30, but not a sign with this. Antenna here is still
the 80m wire loop in the garden. I hope to have an outside E-field
probe set-up for next weekend and we can compare results although
looking for DK7FC will be a priority.
73s
Roger G3XBM
--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/http://www.g3xbm.co.ukhttp://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbmhttps://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL
G11088
|
|
