Thanks for the ongoing reports Roger.
It's odd that despite the same settings and aerial current here my reports seem to vary quite widely from day to day.
I'm wondering what the other variables are . . .
I'm preparing a spread sheet of my VLF reports and will send you a copy when it's done.
There's no problem with my reducing power and at 15.30Z (16.30 UK clock) I'll reduce the PA current to 1/10th its present setting.
73 Chris G3XIZ
--- On Sun, 27/3/11, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: G3XIZ today?
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 27 March, 2011, 15:56
Chris Judging by your signal level, you might just be detectable here with 10-20dB less, especially if I wound the RX bandwidth down a bit more. We should try this sometime. It would be impressive to detect you with real QRP at your end.
73s Roger G3XBM On 27 March 2011 15:53, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
Chris
Your good signal continues.
Using Spectrum Lab at 424uHz bandwidth certainly does the trick. BTW I also looked for you with Spectran in QRSS30, but not a sign with this. Antenna here is still the 80m wire loop in the garden. I hope to have an outside E-field probe set-up for next weekend and we can compare results although looking for DK7FC will be a priority.
73s
Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbmhttps://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088
|
|
