Hi Chris
That's great, did you reduce power, you are still a good signal
here, keep your eye on my grabs, I am going off watch for a while.
QRP rules OK.
73 Eddie G3ZJO
On 27/03/2011 16:29, Chris Osborn wrote:
Thanks for the
ongoing reports Roger.
It's odd that despite the same settings and aerial current
here my reports seem to vary quite widely from day to day.
I'm wondering what the other variables are . . .
I'm preparing a spread sheet of my VLF reports and will
send you a copy when it's done.
There's no problem with my reducing power and at 15.30Z
(16.30 UK clock) I'll reduce the PA current to 1/10th its
present setting.
73 Chris G3XIZ
--- On Sun, 27/3/11, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
wrote:
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: G3XIZ today?
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 27 March, 2011, 15:56
Chris
Judging by your signal level, you might just be
detectable here with 10-20dB less, especially if I
wound the RX bandwidth down a bit more. We should try
this sometime. It would be impressive to detect you
with real QRP at your end.
73s
Roger G3XBM
On 27 March 2011
15:53, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
wrote:
Chris
Your good signal continues.
Using Spectrum Lab at 424uHz bandwidth certainly
does the trick. BTW I also looked for you with
Spectran in QRSS30, but not a sign with this.
Antenna here is still the 80m wire loop in the
garden. I hope to have an outside E-field probe
set-up for next weekend and we can compare results
although looking for DK7FC will be a priority.
73s
Roger G3XBM
--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088
|
|
|
