To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) |
From: | David Pratt <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:04:05 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <80823E80F3B94DCEB2B95EA9A57C72C4@JimPC> |
References: | <[email protected]> <80823E80F3B94DCEB2B95EA9A57C72C4@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Turnpike/6.07-M (<Paa2jShnPcOGTVxWbZGfF9vhHJ>) |
Many thanks for your comments, Jim, and for the detailed background explanation. I just felt we should be aware of possible potential problems. There could be many AM radios (or wirelesses!) still around using old technology. 73 de David G4DMP In a recent message, James Moritz <[email protected]> writes >Having poked around inside quite a few radios over the years, I think >465/470kHz IFs were common in the days of discrete transistors and >tuned IF transformers, but are mostly ancient history now. -- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds. | | Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk | + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: "OM K" 20dB over noise on 137, John Rabson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Reception of VO1NA in EM75xr, Andy - KU4XR |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s), Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s), mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |