Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) |
| From: | David Pratt <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:29:55 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <523d8738-db86-4950-bb5b-1b69289f6cfe@blur> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <523d8738-db86-4950-bb5b-1b69289f6cfe@blur> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Turnpike/6.07-M (<Paa2jShnPcOGTVxWbZGfF9vhHJ>) |
But very few domestic broadcast receivers can be described as 'good', Warren. Even so, I can't imagine any receiver with an IF of 470kHz having an IF rejection of 60dB at 472kHz. If we do cause QRM to b/c receivers people, including the licensing authorities certainly will care about MW. 73 de David G4DMP In a recent message, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes >A good receiver will have something upwards of 60dB i.f. rejection, >consumer models somewhat less. >The bottom line is that nobody cares about MW (except hams!) > -- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds. | | Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk | + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s), [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Who is transmitting on 8970.022 Hz??, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s), [email protected] |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s), James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |